Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We've Moved!
Please join the new board Here
Welcome to Gaming Zone Community. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, using our friend code system, using the pattern maker, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. We are not best viewed in Internet Explorer 8 however, we are best viewed in Mozilla Firefox. Although, we look decent in all other browsers. We recommend Firefox, to download Firefox go here.


Join our community!

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:
- The ability to chat in a shout box for free.
- Free Live Multiplayer Gaming, Online game tournaments.
- Interactive Arcade, with over 25 games, with highscores and more.
- Virtual Money, called "Gaming Dollars"
- Fun contests, with prizes.
- Family Friendly staff and members. And much, much more!

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Call of Duty 4 vs Call of Duty : World at War
Topic Started: September 7, 2009, 8:12 am (123 Views)
Logan18 September 7, 2009, 8:12 am Post #1
Member Avatar


 I've only played World at War, but I'm wondering about everyone else's opinions. Is Call of Duty 4 better than World at War? But, what makes World at War so special that everyone thinks it's better?
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
agentmanningctu September 7, 2009, 6:54 pm Post #2
Member Avatar

 Well the only thing about waw that stands out is nazi zombies. 4 is just awesome.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Deviance September 11, 2009, 5:16 pm Post #3

Call of Duty 4 by a landslide. Infinity Ward is just so much more talented than Treyarch.
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dragon Master October 10, 2009, 5:31 pm Post #4
Member Avatar

 Call of Duty 4 is way better. The story was way more better because you don't know what will happen and one of character you play as died. Also the online play in Call of Duty 4 is more fair then World at War, where if you have MP40 you own.

Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Twisted October 11, 2009, 6:59 pm Post #5

Cod4 imo.
it's funnner in online gameplay.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Vincent October 15, 2009, 1:05 pm Post #6
Member Avatar

 I'd have to say WaW, but only because I don't really like COD's style of shooter, thus the only fun I got out of both games was Nazi Zombies :P Okay, thats not entirely true, I did enjoy COD4 a bit in online multiplayer, much the same as WaW, but the most enjoyable part of both was Nazi Zombies. So WaW wins for me.

But COD isn't my kind of game (e.g. not something I'd go out and buy)
Posted Image
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mushu October 19, 2009, 9:37 pm Post #7
Member Avatar

 I've always heard COD4 and COD5 depends on the choice but depending on how many people use each one then COD4 is better because it takes place in a modern time and COD5 is WWII. I've played both and I like COD4.
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Wichking66 October 21, 2009, 10:42 pm Post #8
Member Avatar

 Well i would say WaW because of nazi zombies...but sadly my cod WaW disc is broke >.> bout 2 map packs for nothing :-(
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kevinash January 15, 2010, 6:35 am Post #9

COD 4 was a masterpiece of gaming. Michelangelo's David was a masterpiece of the art world. Now if I went and took that statue and made my own version of it, I wouldn't come close to the original creators work.

Term Papers
Member Offline View Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Xbox 360 · Next Topic »
Add Reply